The Red Pill Documentary

Cassie Jaye has been getting a lot of criticism for her unbiased approach at documenting the Men’s Rights Movement. Most of the criticism has been thrown at her from Feminists. She responds to these attempts of slander with a video. Remember, the people attacking her are the same people that create our laws, decide what is fair and unfair, and is the ultimate voice/supposed representation of women everywhere.

This video, however, has not stopped David Futrelle’s constant bombardment on twitter. One after another, David Futrelle has showered Cassie with comments. These are the three in reply to her video:

futrelle123But since he doesn’t have any real argument and is getting called out on his bias towards Cassie. Cassie refusing to change her point of view on the subject has created an uproar in the feminist community.  David Futrelle then turns to playing the victim when he has nothing else to fling at her. Even writing an entire article on her “grasping at straws“.

Futrelle2Futrelle1Futrelle3

Independent Australia Comments

Miranda Devine has a problem with #womenagainstfeminism I decided to leave a comment about the article, I didn’t really appreciate being classified as “Self-deprecating”. The original read:

You do realize that the “patriarchy” is nothing more than a conspiracy
theory where you believe that society is systematically built to serve
men at the expense of women…and you want to call US crazy?

 

However, within 24 hours it was deleted from the line of comments:

conspiracy theorySo I re-posted the same comment and even added on to it 20 times on the same thread:

Reposting CommentsDon’t talk crap about an opposing party and then wipe out their voice when they defend their honor. I am not self-deprecating simply because I am against feminism. And she will call this ‘harassment’, however, I am commenting on an article that is NOT private, I am one of many who were targets of these accusations, and I am free to protest these accusations.

Then when I went BACK to check on it, they erased everything. She even deleted a comment I made to another person that was explaining my own position on why I re-posted my comment 20 times. Then they blocked me. So I looked at their comments policy I can negate them all

  1. My comment was NOT off topic since I (not specifically me) was part of the target OF the topic
  2. My comment was not defamatory and inflammatory is subjective
  3. there were no threats OR attacks
  4. It doesn’t contain any explicit language
  5. No references to legal cases
  6. Doesn’t contain personal information
  7. No links unrelated to the subject
  8. Wasn’t longer than the itself
  9. The original WASN’T spam, but my others may have been considered spam
  10. I wasn’t attempting to close debate I was OPENING debate
  11. My original comment was opinion based and had a definition of Patriarchy underneath it (I KNOW the definition because it’s been thrown at me enough)

blockedbyaustraliaBlocked for putting it straight forward: Believing that men benefit at the expense of women, systematically, is crazy.

 

Feminist Programming & De-Programming

Programming is a technique used by cults to assimilate new members into its belief system. In a Feminist society every splinter of cultural belief is used to influence a person to believe a certain way. Does the group realize this process? No, all it sees is itself pressing their message. They see their dream being fulfilled through ‘educating’ others.

There’s a difference between cult mentality and a group simply believing in something. Cults use coincidence and cherry-picked facts to reinforce previous beliefs and will never change their beliefs, despite new information. While groups form beliefs based upon facts and will change their beliefs based upon new information. Instead of applying new information to mold their beliefs, feminists will apply new information to reinforce why their belief is right the way it is.

Each phrase in this line of videos intertwines with the other. All of it is believed at once, like a domino effect, you can be in the process of “I should be able to speak my mind”, being extremely rude, yelling crossing boundaries…then get interrupted and claim that the guy wasn’t respecting you (which is emphasized by the belief of “You deserve respect”). (More videos will be added as time goes on)

All these beliefs at once cause women to not learn vital relationship skills. It creates a foundation of assumptions which then has them make  impulsive choices, in turn it makes their lives miserable. Their lives fall down the toilet, but they use the poor conditions of their lives and broken relationships as evidence as to why:

  1. they need feminism
  2. they are oppressed
  3. people need to help

It’s a constant cycle, only when a woman stops to question whether she is actually oppressed or not does she start out of this cycle. However this means that the woman will have to question her past as well, which is something most women won’t do, it makes them feel less guilty to just say “I’m oppressed by men”. If not she’ll have to start realizing certain things, hard things to admit to.

(Men are Violent excuse) Every bad relationship she’s ever been in was

  • because she chose the man she was with
  • she contributed to the abuse
  • she was the abuser, had the anger issues, and negative habits

(Wage Gap Excuse) She’s living in poverty because

  • she’s lazy
  • she chose to have a child
  • she’s not living within her means (expects more than what she can afford)
  • she’s not planning financially
  • She overspends

(Fat Acceptance Excuse) She’s Obese because

  • She’s lazy
  • She over eats
  • She needs to exercise more

No matter what problem she has, it has to be seen as stemming from a choice she made. This is the key to deprogramming a feminist. Know that even IF a woman denounces the feminist title she can still have feminist habits ingrained into her personality. It’s hard to do and it can only be done by the person themselves, but it’s possible. The best way to have a feminist change, is to have someone she is emotionally attached share their lives with her. A brother, a boyfriend, their son… they need to know the pain of what they’re going through first hand. Almost like an intervention, it’s painful but effective and SO worth it.

 

 

 

Feminism’s Sexualization Of Girls

 

How is this a men’s issue? Doesn’t it benefit men that women are becoming more sexual? The answer to those two questions are simple:

  • These are the future mothers and partners that men will have to deal with. If women are encouraged to embrace destructive behaviors then they will pass it along to their children and like any destructive person, they will blame everyone except for themselves. So when the relationship that lands women pregnant comes to an end due to her sexually explicit behavior, she will end up blaming the man. Since women end up with custody 85% of the time, more and more children will end up being victims of the mother’s encouraged destructive behavior while simultaneously hurting the men out of having believed that she is doing nothing wrong and that everything is his fault.
  • No, women becoming more sexual leads to numerous unplanned pregnancies, with laws not changed will eventually lead to more and more men suffering the burden of unwanted fatherhood, bad relationships, and expensive child support.
  • Please also note that boys will be raised by women like this, which will ultimately hurt his maturing process. When this happens boys raised under a parent such as this is more likely to fail in school, repeat the cycle of the broken household, turn to gangs for emotional support and turn to violence for an emotional outlet.

Men Don’t Tell Movie

A movie made in 1993 which never was released on DVD or VHS due to the backlash from “women’s groups” aka Feminist groups. Why? It paints a reality that women can be extremely violent and it doesn’t take a complete and total wimp to be a victim. This Movie is based on a TRUE story. More Information: Men Don’t Tell Wikipedia

 

Thought Reform

Thought reform is a proper way of saying “brainwashing”, there are several steps to this formal process. Even though Miss Misanthropist has described the signs that feminism is cult very thoroughly: Signs Feminism is A Cult which I do suggest you read as well. I will specifically be applying the formal process known as ‘thought reform’ from step one to the last as feminist groups would apply it. Know that most cult members do not know they are in a cult, most cult leaders do not realize they are applying cult tactics to keep members in line. This is what makes a cult so dangerous. All steps are based on Robert Jay Lifton’s Thought Reform


 

STEP 1- Milieu Control: All communication with the outside world is limited, either being strictly filtered or completely cut off. Individuals are discouraged from thinking incorrect thoughts which may be termed as selfish, immoral and so on.

Application: The media is highly censored when it comes to compositions on the subject of Feminism. Any content that describes feminism in a negative light is stamped as “sexist” and denied publishing. This process limits information that gets to “members” (in feminism all FEMALES are considered to be potential members, but must be approved through their actions). Approved media conforms to what feminists want you to hear about the group, nine times out of ten approved media is in support of their cause. Things such as distorted statistics, NOT seeing oppositional figures, NOT seeing ANY scenarios that support the opposition, and only seeing worst case scenarios that support the cause. Individuals are thought of as selfish or immoral if they do not belief in feminist ideals and are often publicly scrutinized. Also, when it comes to social media, people with opposing views are blocked from conversations so that members can speak amongst themselves. This means there is no opposition amongst the group, this is another example of members cutting themselves off from the rest of the world. Large groups of oppositional parties are also silenced through drastic measures, Like in the Men’s Conference, feminists pulled fire alarms. Please take note that when it comes to individuals, women are scrutinized if they DO conform to traditional gender roles and men are scrutinized if they do NOT conform to traditional gender roles.


 

STEP 2- Mystical Manipulation: The group is taught it has a higher purpose than others outside of the group. All things are then attributed and liked to this higher purpose. Coincidences are portrayed as symbolic events. This association of events is used as evidence that the group truly is special and exclusive.

APPLICATION- Feminists are taught that women are systematically oppressed around the world, that women have it the worst. Men who have feminine qualities are also oppressed under this system. Feminists use coincidences such as the ‘Wage Gap”, the hijab (a cultural phenomenon), or FGM (also a cultural-based phenomenon where females are overjoyed to do so) as proof that there is a systematic oppression that target women specifically by men. They’re taught that anyone outside of these beliefs have been blinded by ‘evil’ of the ‘patriarchy’, are ignorant, and should either be pitied because they don’t love themselves or scorned because we turned into the ‘enemy’. These excuses are devised to get the potentially new member angry with the “other side” and want to do something to combat it. The anger makes them more interested, yet blinded to the facts due to the previous step of isolation and disinformation.


Step 3- Confession: Individuals are encouraged to confess past ‘sins’ as defined by the group. This creates tension between the person’s actions and their stated belief that the action is bad. The consistency principal thus leads the person to fully adopt that the sin is bad and to distance themselves from repeating it.

APPLICATION- Things such as ‘victim blaming’, ‘slut shaming’, or ‘fat shaming’ are considered ‘sins’ that can be confessed. Victim blaming is meant for women in the group to take their attention off the suspected victim and place it on the accused. This creates lack of responsibility on the part of the victim, increases anger towards the male gender (which is from their source of information almost always the perpetrator), and creates a stigma that no matter what the male says the accuser is always a victim by default. Any information petitioned to get to the truth which may potentially blame the victim is considered sexist, and allows disinformation to prosper. ‘Fat Shaming’ is a method used to morph the public into believing that it is their responsibility to make a heavy-set woman feel good, which takes responsibility off the woman. It also considers all images of healthy women encouraging others to get into shape as ‘fat shaming’ and is discontinued. It’s also a sin to think the patriarchy doesn’t exist, to use certain words against females such as bossy, bitch or cunt (unless you’re a feminist saying that to an anti-feminist). Male feminists particularly are shamed just for the fact that they’re males, which to feminism is a sin itself. It makes many men ashamed they are males, embarrassed and/or angry at their own gender through being fed lies or extreme doses of misinformation through steps one and two. They have to “confess” that their gender is horrible because of the coincidental ‘evidence’ presented such as falsified/outdated domestic violence statistics.


STEP 4- Self Sanctification Through Purity: Individuals are encouraged to constantly push towards an ultimate and unobtainable perfection. Not being perfect may be seen as deserving of punishment, which may be meted out by the higher members of the group who are taught that such atonement and self-regulation is a valuable method of reaching higher levels of perfection.

APPLICATION- The group itself is constantly dissatisfied and has an unrealistic belief that:

  • The world will be free of Domestic Violence, rape, and other sources of violence
  • That men and women will be 100% equal, being that they already have equality due to women being good in some areas and men being good in others.
  • That women can be just as certified as men in jobs that require strength, endurance, and speed.
  • That any form of equality can be obtained by focussing primarily on women.
  • Male feminists primarily “bash” themselves and admit to the “sin” of “privilege” to where self-guilt makes him “purer” than men who are not feminists.
  • That any type of quality will be obtained by creating more controlling law applied on a broader spectrum

Feminists constantly believe that they are “purer” than the average person. That they are deserving of better and that they should be given more than they already have. Women in the group believe they deserve more due to being female, while males believe they deserve less. Women in the group believe they’re better than non-feminists due to believing they’re being charitable through their beliefs, that they have a higher level thinking. Male feminists believe they’re better than non-feminist men due to confessing to male privilege, placing his life to feminism/women, and wanting less for himself and his own gender. Remember that steps one and two still apply no matter what step you’re on.


 

STEP 5- Aura of Sacred Science: The beliefs and regulations are soundproof and perfect, absolute and non-negotiable. Rules and processes are therefore to be followed without question, and any transgression is a “sin” and hence requires atonement or other forms of punishment, as does consideration of any alternative view points.

APPLICATION- Feminists who are at this point are relays for more misinformation, these members are used to conserve steps one and two. They are the people that shame non-members, shame men, and that spread misinformation. Any information that does not conform to feminist beliefs are shunned, criticized, and dismissed as false before looked at. They ensure that only the “truth” can be printed, that all laws conform to feminist beliefs, and nothing is ‘sexist’. Only the group can acknowledge other women as feminists, sure women can self-pronounce as feminists, but that doesn’t mean they’ll be accepted as such. Every move will be watched, women must think a certain way in order to be accepted as a feminist. Women who do NOT accept the feminist view point (as considered by feminists) are labelled with “internalized misogyny”.  Any feminist that “sins” with slut shaming, fat shaming, victim blaming or denounces the patriarchy is considered a transgressor and is subject to shunning, defamation or labelled a liar.  Women who think differently in the favour of boys and men are denounced as feminists. This is considered transgression.


STEP 6- Loaded Language: New words and Language are created to explain the new and profound meanings that have been discovered. Existing words are also hijacked and given news and different meaning. Whoever makes the definition also controls how people think.

APPLICATION- Feminism uses their own dictionary, words such as Internalized misogyny, rape culture, and male privilege are all made-up words to describe something. Internalized misogyny explains why women don’t want to be feminists, while rape culture is a word that explains why rape is so “prominent” in our country. Male privilege explains why women are “oppressed” and women can’t be sexist towards men. Existing words, such as sexism, and racism have also been hijacked and redefined.

  • Feminist definition of Sexism= Prejudice + Power VS. Regular Definition: Sexism= Prejudice on basis of sex
  • Feminist Definition of Racism= Prejudice + power VS Regular Definition: Racism= Prejudice on basis of race

This creates a justification for members to be both sexist and racist without having guilt. This creates a cushion for lack of responsibility so that perpetrators of the regular term will feel justified in being racist or sexist. This also means that certain races or the male gender is unable to defend themselves against feminists that are both sexist and racist. It also means that any feminist based laws that, under the regular definition are sexist, are considered perfectly acceptable. This greases the skids for corruption and prejudice against the opposite sex and oppresses them, while by feminist definition, they’re not being oppressed.


 

STEP 7- Doctrine over Person: The Importance of the group is elevated over the importance of the individual in all ways. Beliefs and values can all thus be cast as being invalid if they conflict with group rules.

APPLICATION- Personal beliefs such as:

  •  Women who are stay at home mothers, sex workers, skinny models, women who have a career in fitness, women who wear hijabs, women who don’t believe in abortion, or believe men are getting the short end of the stick
  • Men who do not find fat women attractive, who aren’t attracted to “lose” women, and don’t believe women are oppressed.

The belief of the individual MUST be in line with feminist beliefs or they are considered a danger to the system and are cast out, defamed, or criticized. Many stay at home mothers are criticized, the happiness of the individual’s personal choice is not thought of before the feminist belief system. Feminists press for women to go into STEM fields for the “betterment” of women, however do not take into consideration the woman’s happiness with these choices. Women who are NOT feminists are targets of abuse despite the group believing in ALL women deserving respect. Thus, the thoughts of the individual are less important than the group itself.


 

STEP 8- Dispensed Existence: There’s a sharp line between the outside world and the group. Insiders are to be saved and elevated. Whilst outsiders are doomed to failure and loss. Who is an outsider or insider is chosen by the group. Any person within the group can be damned at any time. People who leave the group are singled out as particularly evil, weak, lost or otherwise to be despised or pitied. Rather than being ignored or hidden, they are used as example of how anyone who leaves will be looked down upon and publicly denigrated. Outsiders who try to persuade the person to leave are doubly feared. Dispensation goes into all aspects of living within the group.

APPLICATION- Women against feminism are women who are constantly despised and pitied, while women like Christina Hoff Sommers are considered evil and presented as liars. They are pointed out by feminists towards other feminists as people to be pitied because they’re ‘ignorant’. They’re considered below feminists because they ‘don’t know’, of course, what feminists obviously DO know. They’re pointed out by feminists as ignorant, they try to convince these women that they don’t know what they’re talking about. They also claim that they can’t think for themselves, yet women who aren’t feminists think for themselves much more than women who are feminists. Women who are not feminists are targeted by feminists in order to either change their minds or abuse them. Ant-feminist women are considered ‘evil’ and are demonized.

Manspreading Stupidity

Within the past week, two men in New York were arrested for the feminist act known as “manspreading”. Manspreading is the act of a man opening his legs slightly while sitting down. This is an act, not of privilege or power like its feminist supporters claim, but out of biology and the right to be comfortable. The two men were arrested on a factor that they could not help, having testicles.

A man’s anatomy is completely different than a females and many feminists don’t understand what it’s like to have something between their legs. A man’s testicles are actually extremely sensitive, particularly to heat. The reason for a man’s testicles to be on the outside is mainly for the production of sperm. A study showed that in the male body, holding the legs shut was the biggest way to overheat the testicles naturally. It showed that simply holding their legs together had an increase in temperature of 2.1 degrees Celsius. Even if a man sits for 15minutes with his legs comfortably positioned (not closed), he increases the temperature to his testicles by 1.8 degrees, which cuts his fertility by at least 40%. Now some would say that a man can always stand, but the point is, he shouldn’t have to. No person should be forced to be placed in an uncomfortable position, especially if that uncomfortable position results in long-term consequences. Due to a lack of space, not all man can afford to stand either, so if they have to sit due to health situations they must be able to sit comfortably. The cost of not being able to do so may go beyond just becoming infertile.

Constantly constricting the testicles can cut off blood flow to the testicles, such as sitting with ones legs closed, can cause short term pain and long term problems. Things such as Testicular torsion, a condition that can be caused by prolonged periods of sitting, can cause extreme pain, vomiting and sometimes even permanent damage to the testicle. It more often than not, requires a surgical procedure to correct it. If a man takes public transportation every day twice a day, yet is forced to sit with his legs closed every time, it could result in the permanent damage to a man’s sexual organs. To enforce “manspreading” is to violate his right to genital integrity, general health, and possibly reproductive rights.

There are otscreenshot-spinepainny com 2015-05-31 12-42-24her reasons to a man’s posture, such as leaning back in their chairs. This is due to taking pressure off the testicles. When a man sits up straight he places pressure on his testicles and the pudendal nerve located at the base of the pelvis. Both males and females have this nerve, the body uses it to send messages from the genitals to the brain. However, if a man sits at a 90degree angle upright, his genitals place pressure on the nerve, to where in a female it would not. A man can only close his legs completely and keep his balance if he sits up straight, but because he has to slouch given his anatomy, his legs have to remain open. Applying pressure on this nerve continuously every day, can have both long and short-term effects. Effects such as Erectile Dysfunction, pain, and numbness in the penis are a few. Either way is it really worth it? Also know, that men who wear tight clothing are at greater risk for all of these symptoms.

These are only a few of the health issues that could result if men are forced to sit up, with their legs closed, on a regular basis. However, a space issue that is not talked about screenshot-www backdesigns com 2015-05-31 12-46-30or enforced is what a new twitter backlash tag calls #shebagging. The act of women taking up space with their handbags, umbrellas, feet, and sometimes even pets. Some feminists argue that it is women’s right to have this luxury because they are the ‘oppressed’ sex, yet if women were the oppressed wouldn’t they be the ones getting arrested? I would place the caption on here, however, since I responded to her with that answer she has since erased her comment. May I remind you that the men who were arrested were on a New York subway car at 12am when the train was half empty. They took up two seats with their posture due to their male anatomy. People on the #shebagging tag are putting up pictures of women in the exact same situations, where the cars are not too crowded, yet no one is arresting them.

Might I also remind you that #shebagging is not excused by prevention of medical illness, preserving genital integrity or reducing the symptoms of pain. It is pure rudeness perpetrated by females. While dealing with the ‘manspreading epidemic’, the crime in New York City has increased, homicide alone jumped by 20% by the end of February in 2015. Yet, feminists are focusing on men getting arrested simply for sitting…like a man should. My final thoughts, get over it, let it go, and focus on real problems. Quit calling men out on stupid things, things that you’d find completely normal if you did your research. The name ‘manspreading’ insinuates that only men take up space, which is a sexist gesture itself given the evidence that both sexes take up equal amounts of space when placed in the same situations. The only thing is…men have an excuse for their situation, women have none, yet it’s the men getting arrested. This is not a gesture of ‘equalizing oppression’ or ‘acknowledging a space issue’, it’s a gesture of hate from one gender towards another, a human rights violation, and females aren’t the ones with the targets on them.

ICASA’s Misinformation

The biggest sexual assault project in Illinois, Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault (ICASA), seems to have a bias against men. ICASA is woven into the system of almost every domestic violence shelter in the state of Illinois. It is used as an information source to these shelters, and in return, shelter information is posted on ICASA’s home page. The information, when looked through, is neither up-to-date or gender neutral. Sure, some of the documents that are presented give great advice when it pertains to what females can do in the case of a sexual assault. They even have an entire document on male survivors. Yet, when looked through, every bit of information completely places emphasis on males being perpetrators and females being victims.

In ICASA’s ‘Acquaintance Rape‘ pamphlet, published 2010, makes the warning of feminine pronouns relating to victims. With letters so tiny you barely notice them, they wrote their reasoning for this as “women are most commonly the victims of sexual assault.”  The ‘notice’ label is easy to miss, most people probably do miss it and start processing information. Without there being a gender-neutral standpoint passer-byes are processing a false picture. Since anyone can be a victim and anyone can be a perpetrator, it is the responsibility of a government-funded program to write it’s information in gender neutral terms. If not, a stereotype is created which makes it harder for the least talked about gender to either receive the help they need, or even be believed. In this pamphlet, all paragraphs that had gender-related pronouns only had females as victims. There were nineteen references to the female being a victim. There was a brief seven sentence section that defined males as victims, but never said he or him once.

Claiming women are most commonly the victims of sexual assault is not only not an excuse for using feminine pronouns, it’s a false statement to begin with. In more up-to-date information it’s been shown that men are just as likely to be victims of rape as women are. This information was found when Cathy Young discovered that the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) was not categorizing “made to penetrate” as rape, but placed in its own separate category. When categorizing this variable as rape, it was found out that men are raped as much as women. (CATHY YOUNG’S article)

Through ICASA’s “A Guide to Advocacy Services“, something shocking revealed itself. I found that ICASA’s definition of Criminal Sexual Assault was displayed on page 10. Criminal sexual assault is defined as “The attacker used force to sexually penetrate the victim’s body”. I didn’t believe this to be true, after all this means the only way a man could be raped under Illinois law was if he got penetrated by a foreign object. This completely disregards “made to penetrate” as a means of rape under Illinois law. I did more research to make sure it was ICASA’s mistake. I went to the Illinois General Assembly and found it’s definition of criminal sexual assault was unfortunately the same.

A person commits criminal sexual assault if that person commits an act of sexual penetration

I asked myself if the term ‘sexual penetration’ included ‘forced to penetrate and decided to look up the legal definition. According to the United States Department of Justice it’s…

The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.

As you can see, in Illinois you need to actually be penetrated in order to classify, by definition, as being criminally sexually assaulted or raped. Meaning, unless a woman uses a foreign object to a man, she cannot by definition rape him, thus cannot charged with criminal sexual assault. This could be the reason for ICASA claiming that a male being raped by a female is rare, simply because most female perpetrators don’t penetrate their victims. This is a loophole statistics, people see rape as forced to have sex no matter what gender you are. Yet, to keep it looking as though women are raped more often than men, large organizations use legal definitions to hide the problem. They use legal terms of rape to boost their statistics, in order to gain more funding. They’re politically correct with their misinformation, however, if you want to speak regular English men are getting raped as much as women.

Another thing from ICASA that caught my eye was from the “Acquaintance Rape Facts” it displayed the average outdated false statistics, but one made no sense.

50% of acquaintance rapes involve alcohol consumption by the offender, victim or both.

Notice how it said the offender or both, meaning one or the other? Looking back at their “Guide to Advocacy Services“, I noticed that on page 11 it states that,

Sexual assault and sexual abuse are crimes. They are crimes even if…

And right there, the very LAST bullet said:

The victim was drunk or unconscious

Since they’re focusing on females as victims, these statements are completely conflicting. Right underneath, another bullet reminds you that anyone can be a victim of sexual assault. This means in this statistic, that if it’s a man who is drunk he is the perpetrator, if it’s a woman that is drunk she is the victim, and if they’re both drunk they still qualify it as rape. This statistic is completely inadequate because it defies any logic at all. If a consumer of alcohol is not in their right mind to begin with; how can they be considered a perpetrator? Should they not be the victim from ICASA’s own information, that claims it’s rape if you have sexual intercourse with the intoxicated? If both parties are intoxicated how can either party be at fault? One is no more in their right mind than the other!

So what does all this mean? Why is this so important? Flat out, we’re being ‘dooped’ right under our own noses. Statistics that may be 30 years or older that “everyone knows to be facts”, side by side with twisted definitions of sexual assault to exclude males, brings big money to female organizations. Organizations that are often headed by feminist groups, the system is designed to keep the dollars rolling into their piggy banks and sometimes straight into their pockets. Using political correctness makes the average person miss the whole picture and creates the image that they want them to see. It makes college women believe they’re being targeted more than men, which in turn makes them both fearful and angry. Resulting in hysteria on school campuses, which then heightens security and pushes people towards creating more ridiculous controlling laws. Losing our rights and freedoms in the hopes that this “high statistic” will somehow come down. While we are too busy running a gendered war, the government is slowly gaining more and more control over our lives, all thanks to NOT categorizing ‘forced to penetrate’ as rape.